Australia
and Agenda 21 - The Timeline
By US Correspondent Cherie Zaslawsky
Our cities are being radically,
aggressively altered according to the “Sustainable Development” plan, which is
inflicting “Smart Growth” aka: “New Urbanism,” on our tranquil suburban
communities. The claim is that we must change our lives, give up driving, and
live in crowded multi-use buildings by train and bus lines, in order to save the
planet from the scourge of global warming. Al Gore warned us of the dire effects
of global warming in his 2006 film An Inconvenient Truth. This film was later
found incorrect in many of its claims Ref to facts contained on
voiceofthepeoplelobbygroup.com click> updates Feb/2008 part one. However, major
principles of “Sustainability” and its source, the United Nations’ Agenda for
the 21st Century (aka: Agenda 21) were introduced as early as 1976 in the United
Nations’ document: The Vancouver Declaration on Human Settlements and the
Vancouver Action Plan, as seen from the following quote:
“Land… cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and
subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land
ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of
wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice…”
Not only was this 30 years prior to the global warming hysteria, but at that
time, scientists were asserting that the climate was cooling. Also recall that
Agenda 21, which calls for what Al Gore has since termed a “wrenching
transformation” of America, was unveiled in 1992, and incorporated into American
governmental machinery in 1993, via Clinton’s President’s Council on
Sustainability. This radical agenda was adopted in America a full 13 years
before the UN’s IPCC released its famous (or infamous, depending on one’s
perspective) study claiming to prove the existence of catastrophic manmade
global warming. In other words, the “Sustainability” agenda, which calls for
governmental and, by extension, international control of land, natural
resources, food, water, energy, cars, housing and more, in America, was drawn up
many years before global warming hit the decks as a rationale for the program.
The cart came before the horse. And now we are asked to believe that the already
debunked and always highly controversial hypothesis of catastrophic
anthropogenic global warming is reason enough for us to sacrifice our homes, our
lands, our property, our rights, our way of life, and our country.
Notice too that “global warming” morphed into “climate change”, presumably
because people were noticing the world was not getting hotter. And then, since
the “climate” i.e. weather, is always changing, the buzzword morphed again, into
“climate reality,” presumably because one cannot argue against “reality.” The
hysteria increased with the emotionally charged term “climate deniers,”
conjuring up the moral perfidy of holocaust deniers, and ratcheting up the whole
bogus theory to the level of religious dogma which relies on faith. All of this,
of course, is the opposite of hard science. Perhaps that’s why 20,000+
legitimate, non-UN-sponsored scientists have not only debunked the flawed theory
that was based on flawed computer modeling, but have also expressed outrage at
this parody of science.
In short, the “Sustainability” plan is about power and control, not about the
weather. It is a plan by and for the elitist 1% who seek to dominate and exploit
the 99% in an unprecedented global power play masquerading as humanitarian
environmentalism. It would bring about the greatest transfer of wealth in human
history, from us to them.
Who are some of these great environmentalists? Are they living in modest hovels
and riding their bicycles to keep their “carbon footprints” down? Or living in
crowded Smart Growth stack-and-pack condos along rail corridors? I doubt if this
profile, prescribed for the 99%, will be followed by the chieftains of
Sustainability: billionaires Maurice Strong, Al Gore, Mikhail Gorbachev, and
George Soros, among others.
In the US the facts are , Al Gore, Obama, a host of Goldman Sachs heavy hitters,
and George Soros (through connections with the Joyce Foundation), have already
lined up to profit off the 99 percenters’ misery, by creating the Chicago
Climate Exchange with which to make a predicted $10 trillion a year from our
planned crippling carbon taxes. But wouldn’t this system cause energy rates to
go down? Then-Presidential Candidate Barack Obama stated: “Under my plan of a
cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” Ah yes, to
discourage the 99% from using heat, air-conditioning, stoves, or light bulbs.
And to provide great profits for…take a guess.
The elite US multinational powerbrokers, financiers and billionaires who run the
country behind the scenes, want to switch from the war machine they’ve used to
fatten their coffers all these years, to a ‘peace economy’; while this sounds
good at first, they long since made plans to substitute a created global
catastrophe for war, so they can continue to exploit and control the masses.
They’ve said as much in several of their publications, including the Club of
Rome’s The First Global Revolution.
Whether you follow the money or follow the science, it becomes all too clear
that the 1% is out to own the world and everyone and everything in it. This is
the New World Order, and this is why we need to fight every aspect of Agenda
21/Sustainable Development, including: Smart Growth, the Grand Boulevard
Initiative, Climate Action Plans, Carbon Taxes, Cap-and-Trade.
Cherie Zaslawsky, MA, is a writer, editor, and educator. She is committed to the
fight against Agenda 21 and to educating the public regarding the real and
present dangers it represents