WHERE DOES AUSTRALIA STAND WITH PRESIDENT ELECT, DONALD TRUMP?
From the outset we must point out the obvious, that President Elect Donald Trump has no love for bankers. Just as many senior members of the Turnbull Govt.
The Labour Party and The Greens openly supported Hilary Clinton in the U.S. election whilst being severely critical of Donald Trump. Therefore we find it very interesting, that Austalia’s largest State NSW’s leader Premier Michael Baird and Austrialia’s Prime Minister Turnbull are former bankers.
We must emphasise that 40 years plus of political white-anting of Australia was in the main, created by unelected, faceless Bureaucrats and signed off on, by Senior Cabinet Ministers, in the Federal, State and Territorial Courts.
We are certain, Mr Trump will be extremely concerned in why Premier Baird’s NSW Govt. leases the Newcastle port to Chinese Govt. interests fully knowing that we have an Air Force nearby in Williamstown. The Northern Territory Govt. has done likewise with the port of Darwin, where Australia has a Naval Base.
Premier Baird has sunk from bad to worse by allowing the Chinese company Shenhua Watermark Coal Pty. Limited to purchase Prime Agricultural Land on the Liverpool Plains for the mining of Coal Seam Gas. It appears that Premier Baird’s Govt. have adopted a Hitler style leadership against the struggling families of NSW, more so in the Sydney Metropolitan Area.
They have enforced, compulsory Acquisition of homes to satisfy the salivating, greedy developers. If the Baird Govt. wanted to create extra housing in the Sydney Metropolitan Area, in lieu of destabilising young families, elderly homeowners and residents from the Parramatta Rd, Canterbury Rd and the Sydenham – Bankstown rail corridors, they should push the approval for medium to high-rise apartments, as a better alternative, by redirecting their development plans to out of the way suburbs such as Bellevue Hill, Double Bay, Dover Heights, Edgecliff, Potts Point, Rose Bay, Vaucluse and Woollahra.
The Baird Govt. must take into account the large number of rooms and attachments in these mansions of the aforementioned suburbs, which are under utilised. Surely our proposition is by far a more sensible alternative.
Forgive us for being repetitive, but the Baird Govt’s. Hitler style governance has introduced forced council amalgamations. Once could be forgiven in believing these forced mergers were introduced for possible financial gain, by paving the way for carte blanche construction to developers. Or maybe the Premier could be protecting his Liberal Party councillor colleagues from fraudulent development approvals exposure.
In fact we possess irrefutable evidence that fraudulent development approvals, by the former Canterbury (NSW) City Council, aided and abetted by the Department of NSW Planning and Infrastructure did occur. When Canterbury and Bankstown Councils were forced to merge, one has to ask why these councils failed to challenge the NSW Govt. in the courts as other councils have done.
The Turnbull Liberal-National Coalition, and his predecessors, Tony Abbott Labours Gillard and Rudd are guilty of allowing the sale of Prime Agricultural Land and the 99 year lease of our Country’s ports to Communist Chinese interests.
Australia’s Federal, State and Territorial Govts. have almost run out of assets to sell. One must understand you can’t get a diploma for common sense. You can’t put brains in statues and Govts. should never sell the goose that laid the golden egg.
It would be remiss of us, to overlook the statement made by the Baird appointed Administration to the Canterbury-Bankstown council meeting on Tuesday night
July 26, 2016.
Addressing the council meeting the Administrator Richard Colley Said, a number of decisions have “eroded the territory,” of the Canterbury Residential Development Strategy – the corridors guiding plan. “The former Canterbury Council approved developments well in excess of the height and scale recommended by the Strategy resulting in inconsistent and disorderly development along the corridor,” he said.
Mr Colley, should you fail to address the former Canterbury Council’s fraudulent development approvals, it seems we’ll have no choice but to push for your indictment as being an access, after the fact.
We have received reliable information that the Baird Govt. has been compulsory acquiring homes way below the valuation price.
Last, but not least, we want you to slowly peruse the United Nation’s (U.N.) submission to the “Copenhagen Summit” which was held in December 2009. Go to our Home Page and click onto Copenhagen Summit. The U.N.’s submission was supported by the Rudd Labor Govt. – the Turnbull opposition and The Greens. The U.N. wanted Australia to sell their Sovereignty and be part of the New World Order.
On Thursday October 3, 2013 Malcolm Roberts now a Queensland Senator with Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party sent the following letter to the Australian Govt’s, Environment Minister Greg Hunt and copies to his Parliamentary colleagues.
Political Foresight: A speech made by the Nostradamus of the time.
Your comments can be emailed-Attention Phil at firstname.lastname@example.org
180 Haven Road,
Pullenvale QLD 4069
Phone: 0419 642 379 and 07 3374 3374
Thursday, October 3rd, 2013
The Hon Greg Hurt Environment Minister PO Box 6022
House of Representatives Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600
PO Box 274
Hastings Vic 3915
Fax: (03) 5979 3034
Re: Your stated dependence on BOM and CSIRO climate advice Congratulations on your re-election and appointment as a Minister.
You're transitioning to a government and cabinet with a massive task to restore integrity, governance and sovereignty and cut waste. I'll be succinct.
On Monday, September 23rd, 2013 you stated on ABC-TV's Lateline program, quote:
· "I'll take my primary advice from the Bureau (of Meteorology) and from the CSIRO" - after 6:33 minutes elapsed;
· "My judgment is that the science is real" - after 6:49 minutes elapsed;
· "In principle support" (for ratifying Kyoto II) - after 10:57 minutes elapsed Lateline: http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2013/s3854803.htm
On what basis have you made your judgment? Please provide titles and dates of CSIRO and BOM reports and briefings upon which your position and judgment rely.
I confidently and truthfully state that you have no empirical scientific evidence supporting your judgment and position. Your position is unscientific and unfounded. It contradicts empirical scientific evidence. I will explain why your position is based on dishonesty and is not honest.
I have comprehensively investigated climate claims and reports made by CSIRO and BOM. Both falsely imply scientific support. Yet neither has any empirical scientific evidence or 'logical scientific reasoning for the core claim that human carbon dioxide caused Earth's latest modest cyclic global atmospheric warming that ended in 1998.
Written responses from CSIRO's Chief Executive and BOM's Director failed to provide scientific evidence for their claim. Both misrepresent science and falsely and without foundation deceptively imply scientific evidence of human causation.
Referring to the enclosed copy of a letter from Julie Bishop, have you responded to her letter to you? You were separately sent by Registered Post two paper copies of my report entitled CSIROh!. Have you identified any specific errors?. Replies from senior CSIRO and BOM executives have identified no specific errors. http://www.conscious.com.au/CSIROh!.html'See Appendices 6, 6a, 2 and 4
My recent requests of CSIRO and BOM made under Freedom of Information legislation reveal that CSIRO's Chief Executive has sent no reports on climate change to relevant Ministers during the years covered: 2005 or later. BOM provided one report and scratchy updates at uneven intervals. All relied on the demonstrably corrupt UN IPCC and contradict empirical scientific evidence.
CSIRO has parroted the UN IPCC's "consensus science". That is not science. The UN IPCC has no evidence that human CO2 caused global warming.
The Garnaut Review relied on the UN IPCC, CSIRO and BOM. Chapter 2 admits no evidence for your claim that human CO2 affects global climate and needs to be cut.
In April 2011 I made a presentation in your office and, at you request, gave you many documents. In July 2011 your responses repeatedly failed to specify any errors.
You have not answered my letter dated March 7th, 2013 requesting clarification on your deni41 of detailed knowledge of UN Agenda 21 despite publicly documented support by you for UN Agenda 21 programs.
My voluntary, independent investigations for six years prove there is no evidence of human CO2 causing modest cyclic global warming and cooling periods since 1850. That's consistent with data from leading climate scientists here and internationally.
Your position does not meet my need for integrity. To meet needs for integrity and reassurance, please provide scientific evidence and identify the agencies and their reports and data on which your judgment relies. Failure to do so will confirm my informed conclusion you have no such evidence.
Your party has inherited a mess of extraordinary breadth and depth. Rectification requires identifying truth rather than accepting false and unscientific climate claims fabricated by Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard. They, Penny Wong and Greg Combet need to be held accountable for their lies - not echoed and thereby endorsed.
Cutting Direct Action and energy subsidies will save taxpayers billions of dollars.
In ending our previous meeting in your office you said in front of Gordon Alderson that my presentation had been one of the very best you'd ever received. I can assist you in returning to honesty on climate and am available to meet with you.
Original personally signed
cc: Tony Abbott, Julie Bishop, Barnaby Joyce, Warren Truss, Craig Kelly, George Christensen, Jane Prentice, Dennis Jensen, Cory Bernardi, Andrew Robb, electronically to all Coalition MPs Sr Flinders Liberal Party branch executive members, and posting to http://www.conscious.com.au/letters.html
Enclosures: Copy Of Letter from Julie Bishop Dated 6th March, 2013
Enclosures: Copy of letter from Julie Bishop dated 6th March, 2013
Back in 1944 U.S. congressman Samuel Pettingill warned that communism would help America spend itself INTO BANKRUPTCY and was striving to get Americans to become TOTALLY DEPENDANT on a Centralised Government.
In his speech Petingill gave his fellow members of the U.S. House of Representatives the 12 points of the Socialist manifesto for the destruction of free government. See if this pattern he spoke of is familiar to the political white anting of Australia.
“The people must be made to feel their utter helplessness and their inability to solve their own problems. While in this state of mind, there is help up before them, a benign and all-wise to whom they must look for the cure of all of their ills.”
The principle of local self-government must be wiped out, so that this leader of group in control can have all the political power readily at hand.
Constitutional guarantees must be swept aside. This is accomplished in part by ridiculing them as outmoded and an obstruction to progress.
Public faith in the legal profession and respect for the courts must be undermined.
The law making body must be intimidated and from time to time rebuked, so as to prevent the development of public confidence in it.
Economically, the people must be ground down by high taxes, which under one pretext or another they are called upon to pay. Thus they are brought to a common level and all income above a meagre living is taken from them. In this manner, economic independence is kept to a minimum.
Disarm the citizens so they cannot fight back.
A great pubic debt must be built up, so that the citizens can never escape its burden, making government the virtual receiver for the entire nation.
A general distrust of private business and industry must be kept alive so that the public may not begin to rely upon its own resources.
Government bureaus are to be set up, to control practically every phase of the citizen’s life.
The education of the youth of the nation is taken under control, so that all may be inoculated at an early age, with a spirit of submission to the system.
To supplement and fortify all the foregoing, there is kept a steady stream of Government propaganda to extol all that bow and kneel to vilify those who dare to raise a voice of dissent.
Don’t say it can’t happen in Australia
*The signing of “Lima Declaration” in March, 1975.
*The introduction of the dual reciprocal taxation act for International. corporations.
*The signing of GATS (Goods Agreement in Trades and Services) in Chile.
*The introduction of the U.S.F.T.A – USA/Australia – Free Trade Agreement which commenced January 1, 2005.
*The Sale of Australian owned Assets, without referendum.
*Legislation by parliament will be passed unopposed as the Coalition Liberal Government will have majority votes in both houses.